![]() With its 1120 cores, the HD 6870 is not too far from the HD 5870 (Cat 10.9)… Radeon HD 5870 score in MSI Kombustor: 21947 points I just tested Kombustor with a Radeon HD 5870 with the same settings: ![]() Since the default mode of MSI Kombustor is really soft for modern GPUs, the HD 6870 GPU could reach 90☌ under a violent stress test… Of course FurMark-like tests are not representative of real 3D tests like in game rendering but it shows the GPU raw power…Īt the end of the test, the Bart XT GPU reached 78☌. This is interesting because MSI Kombustor like FurMark is very GPU intensive and the CPU does not affect much the final score. GeForce GTX 460 score in MSI Kombustor: 9238 points I quickly ran a the same test with my GTX 460: ![]() The settings are 1920×1080 fullscreen, 60 seconds and unlock power draw UNCHECKED (default mode), no AA and no postfx. I just found on ard|OCP forums the MSI Kombustor 1.1.3 score of a Radeon HD 6870 (with Catalyst 10.10). Kombustor won’t be the first tool out of the box, but you will wonder how you got along without it.Radeon HD 6870 score in MSI Kombustor: 20113 points Kombustor’s user interface is simple, but plenty of power hides behind those four buttons.Īll this adds up to a nice, if not primary, testing and benchmarking package for hardware enthusiasts. This is quite valuable information, especially since so many of the tests feature OpenGL. Unstable or crippled builds pop into sharp relief, halving their frame rates over previous versions or other cards with lesser hardware. This puts some limits on it as a hardware reference tool, but makes Kombustor quite useful for study of driver code performance. Kombustor is more dependent on drivers than most benchmarks, and different driver versions can swing results wildly in one direction or the other. In reality, the benefits over less-integrated solutions are slight (is it really that hard to run two programs side by side?), but Kombustor is a good enough utility that this still seems like a feature. The concept here is that you overclock with Afterburner and then immediately test with Kombustor, which is available via a button on Afterburner’s interface. MSI promotes Kombustor’s integration with Afterburneras a one-stop tweaking solution for FPS-obsessed gamers, and it’s a pretty good pitch. The longer Kombustor tests feature filters, depth-of-focus, and other advanced hardware tricks. The results aren’t as comprehensive as larger suites, but they are reliable and revealing nevertheless. The result is a reasonably accurate picture of capability, especially cooling capacity. ![]() ![]() The PhysX tests have fewer options but run longer, and provide more diverse scripts with plenty of fireworks to keep things interesting. MSI dials back the pain a bit, but augments that product’s burn-in features with expanded benchmarking capabilities, support for DirectX, linkages to Afterburner for test-and-tune sessions and a whole lot more objects, scenes and settings to look at while it all gets done. Kombustor is based on Furmark, a stress test famous in the enthusiast community for frying videocards alive in its quest to probe GPUs’ outer limits. Kombustor’s fur test is anything but soft on your GPU. It’s a benchmark called Kombustor, and it’s aptly named. Hardware manufacturer MSI, creators of Afterburner, have conjured up a way to make your overachieving videocard sweat for a change. This and other inconsistencies mean you need to go beyond FRAPS and your favorite game when looking at overclocked GPU stability. Your clock-cooked Radeon may sneer at Skyrim on max settings, but those same speeds can make your computer crash and burn when playing Witcher II. Pushing up memory and core speeds on video hardware has consequences, not all of them readily apparent. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |